Gender Equitable Community Development through Benazir Income Support Programme Beneficiaries Committees (BBCs) in District Dir Upper, Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58329/criss.v3i1.97Abstract
Abstract Views: 56
In this study, the researcher evaluated the role of the Benazir Income Support Programme Beneficiaries Committees (BBCs) in the context of social inclusion, gender-equitable community development by utilization of Mixed Methods Research (MMR) strategy from BB’s perspective in the area. Wherein, three hundred eighty-four (384) out of the total of 72869 populations was taken as a sample size for the quantitative portion and Thirty (30) interviewees were selected on the basis purpose sampling for the qualitative portion of the study. Besides that, three focused group discussions were conducted under the concurrent explorative design to validate the results. Wherein, findings of the study reflected that BBCs positively contributed towards the social inclusion of women in terms of their social safety net, social empowerment and gender-equitable community development. Moreover, a significant relationship (R= .000) was noted between the dependent variables (GBCD) and the independent variables (BBCs), with an R-squared value of .000. Similarly, the results revealed a meaningful correlation (R= .000) between BBCs as the independent variable and the social inclusion of women (SIW) as the dependent variable, with an R-value of .000. The study suggests the expansion of BBCs to strengthen all the Social Safety Net Initiatives that will perform an effective role in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals 2030. Moreover, this study will be helpful for the researchers and policy-makers of social safety nets in the context of social inclusion of women and gender-equitable community development.
Keywords:
Social Inequality, Social Inclusion of Women, Social Safety Net and Gender Equitable Community Development
References
Alam, A. (2004). Social Change and Development. Peshawar: Saif Printing Press, PP. 179-180.
Alam, A. (2006). Research Methodology in Social Research. Peshawar: Awan Printing Press, P. 38.
Alam, A. (2008). Community Development and Social Welfare. Peshawar: Awan Printing Press, PP. 141-167.
Allen, T., & Thomes, A. (2000). Poverty and Development into the 21st Century (2nd ed). Oxford University Press, PP. 53-91.
Anne, D. (2009). Sociology of Development. Ireland: Kimmage Development Studies Centre, Whitehall Press, PP. 2-3.
Bhasin, K. (2003). What is Patriarchy? New Delhi: Age International Publisher, PP. 1-4.
Bowley, A. L. (1920). Pioneer in Modern Statistic and Economics. Singapore: World Scientific Agency, P. 325.
Carley, M., & Spapens, p. (2017). Sharing the World: Sustainable Living and Global Equity in the 21st Century. London: Rutledge Publisher, PP. 5-11.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approach (5th ed). Sage Publications, PP. 4-18.
Ember, C. & M, Ember. (2003). Anthropology (3rd ed) New Delhi: New Age International Publishers, PP. 305-306.
Emily. A., & R, Clark. (2003). How It’s Done? An Introduction to Social Research (2nd ed). Australia: Nelson Thomson Publishing Company, PP. 104-125.
Fluerbaey, M. (2018). A Manifesto for Social Progress: Idea for a Better Society. Cambridge University Press, PP. 18-109.
Fukuyama, F. (2001). Social Capital, Civil Society and Development: Third World Quarterly, 22(1), 7-20.
Halfpenny, P. (2015). Positivism and Sociology: Explaining Social Life. London: George Allen & Unwin Publisher Ltd, Park Lane, PP. 45-63.
Kothari, C. R. (2003). Research Methodology Methods and Techniques (2nd ed). New Delhi: New Age International Publishers, PP. 223.
Lewis, M. (2003). The emergence and consciousness role in human development. Journals’ of New York Academy of Science, 1001(1)104-134.
Macluhan, (1960). Exploring in Communications: Boston, England: Beacon Press. P. 3.
Matson, R. (2005). The Spirit of Sociology: A Reader. India: Pearson Education Company, P. 299.
Moser, C. & Kalton, G. (1971). Survey Methods in Social Investigation (2nd ed). London: Heinemann Publisher. The UK. PP. 16-22.
Sanford, N. (2017). Self and Society: Social Change and Individual Development. Routledge. P. 7.
Sharma, K. A. (2006). Social Problems and Welfare. New Dehli: Atlantic Publisher and Distributor, Mehra Press, PP. 55-88.
Shford, A. (1995). May Entire Issues Devoted To World Food problem. Clifornia: Free Press, PP. 224-231.
Silver, H. (2007). The process of social exclusion: The dynamic of an evolving concept. Chronic Poverty Research Centre Working Paper, (95), PP. 2-6.
Woolcocker, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society 27 (2), 151-208.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Method. London: Sage Printing Press, P. 12.
Retrieved from: www.bisp.gov.pk: An Orientation to BISP on 19 November, 2021.
Retrieved from: http://www.kenpro.org/sample-size-determination-using-krejcie-and-morgan- table/ on 12 December 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 CARC Research in Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
