COGNITIVE INOCULATION AGAINST MISINFORMATION: A NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTION FRAMEWORK

Authors

  • Hamza
  • Shandana Ali

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58329/criss.v4i2.185

Abstract

Abstract Views: 7

Misinformation in the modern digital era goes viral easily and has a severe consequence on the opinion of people, social divisions, and the decision-making process. The spread of fake news is a grave issue because it may influence the ideas and actions both directly and indirectly. In order to fight this, a psychological intervention, cognitive inoculation, meant to develop resistance to misinformation, has been regarded as an effective approach. This research is an outcome of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in which 200 participants will be used to evaluate the functionality of cognitive inoculation in alleviating belief in fake news. The participants were taken to the scanner of the fMRI attributes to both pre- and post-inoculation intervention wherein the brain activity of resisting misinformation could be observed. The results indicate that there was a significant post-inoculation training 41% decline in the belief in fake news. Besides, the research found that there were considerable shifts in the activation patterns of the prefrontal cortex which are associated with higher order cognitive processes like reasoning and decision making. Such brain changes indicate that cognitive inoculation does not only produce changes in the way that individuals process information but it can also affect the brain processes underlying the resistance to misinformation. The research is the first neurobiological indication of the cognitive inoculation applicability as there is evidence of psychological strategies to fight misinformation at both cognitive and neural levels.

Author Biographies

Hamza

Lecturer

Kohat University of Science & Technology, Kohat

Shandana Ali

Lecturer

Kohat University of Science & Technology, Kohat

Keywords:

cognitive inoculation, misinformation, neuropsychology, intervention, fMRI, media literacy

References

Adolphs, R. (2010). What does the amygdala contribute to social cognition? Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 1-27.

Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. Guilford Press.

Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Cook, J. (2017). The debunking handbook. Australian National Centre for the Public Awareness of Science.

McGuire, W. J. (1961). Resistance to persuasion and attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 58(1), 77-88.

Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167-202.

Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2018). Fighting misinformation on the internet. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(3), 1-40.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-03

How to Cite

Hamza, A., & Ali, S. (2025). COGNITIVE INOCULATION AGAINST MISINFORMATION: A NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTION FRAMEWORK. CARC Research in Social Sciences, 4(2), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.58329/criss.v4i2.185

Issue

Section

Articles